U.S. Cellular does not want to sign a lease extension with us because they are claiming they need to have a Right of First Refusal in the event I want to sell my lease for cash. This is an old cell tower that they have utilized for almost 20 years without a Right of First Refusal in their current lease. How important is this to get in the contract?
US Cellular wants to have the right of first refusal to buy the lease revenue stream, and most property owners will sadly end up giving it to them. When this happens property owners lose out. Why? Do you think that a company will bend over backwards to make you an awesome offer for your cell tower lease if they know that US Cellular has the right to match their offer and offer you a dime more and get your lease.
USA is still a free market capitalist system not a Socialist country.... but who know for how much longer? Giving the carrier the ROFR is not consistent with a free market system and IMHO should not be given to them. Of course they use this as a bargaining chip. Tell them to "man up" and play nice in the sandbox with everyone else and make you an offer you can't refuse if and when you sell this.
Like this page? Show us some Social Love. Here's how.
Would you prefer to share this page with others by linking to it?
Click on the HTML link code below.
Copy and paste it, adding a note of your own, into your blog, a Web page, forums, a blog comment, your Facebook account, or anywhere that someone would find this page valuable.
Our church has been approached by a company who wants to put a cell tower on our property. They first offered $1,000 per month with a 2% annual escalator
I own property that the cell tower company has to cross to access their proposed site. Are they entitled to legal use of the specific easement. Also our
