fiber optics added to existing tower

by Arthur
( CA)

It appears that the Crown Castle representative wants to include fiber optic capabilities to my existing pole. Crown Castle is attempting to take over the negotiations with Verizon, and possibly the others on the pole, AT&T and Sprint. The pressure is being placed on me to grant an easement of over 2,000 linear ft, and 5 ft. wide, of my property for a very modest amount of money. (A one time payment of $3,000). My counter offer was $1,000 per month, rent, with an annual increase of 5%, or, the CPI of Orange or LA county, whichever is highest. This formula is present in my current lease arrangements with AT&T. They are resistant to this offer, stating that this amount($12,000 per year +), will be very expensive to them in the future. They have not responded to my offer. They have access to the cell site, with the right to cross over the property, and to park next to the site, with NO RIGHT to dig for the installation of fiber optic cable. There is no easement that has been granted to ANYONE to dig on the property. What are your thoughts?

Comments for fiber optics added to existing tower

Average Rating

Click here to add your own comments

Oct 14, 2015
Rating

fiber optics added to existing tower
by: Bob C

First thing that strikes me... Crown wants 10,000 sq ft of your property for a one time payment of $3000. And you're considering taking 30 cents a square foot for as long as they want it??

Second major thing that strikes me is even if you took a one time payment of any amount for an open ended easement what would stop them from putting a tower and support equip on the easement and not paying you a dime? You would have to have a lawyer pick that agreement apart to the bone before you sign anything.

I have 2 sites on my property and I make them ask every time before they even set foot on my property. Neither has an easement.

Jun 05, 2015
Rating

Pigs vs. Hogs
by: Anonymous

LOL STEVE!!

Jun 04, 2015
Rating

California dreaming
by: Steve

Don't you realize the carriers benefit from the fiber Crown is bringing to the tower? If the carriers can't operate a site that can handle the traffic, they will eventually move and find an alternate location.

My thoughts. Pigs get fat. Hogs get slaughtered.

Click here to add your own comments

Join in and write your own page! It's easy to do. How? Simply click here to return to Cell Tower Leasing Discussion.

Cell-Tower-Leases.com
Contact Tower Genius

Please note that all fields followed by an asterisk must be filled in.

First Name*

Last Name*

Email*

Phone*

Cell Site Street Address*

Cell Site City*

Cell Site State*

Type of Lease*

Service Needed*

How Can We Help*

Privacy*

	I am at least 16 years of age.
	I have read and accept the privacy policy.
	I understand that you will use my information to contact me or send me the information I requested.

Please enter the word that you see below.

Cell tower lease agreements Selling Cell Tower Lease Tower lease extensions Cell site upgrades Small cell proposals Lease amendments Tower lease buyout offers Rooftop lease buyout offers Rooftop cell site audits Lease Agreement defaults Cell tower valuations Rent reduction solicitations Lease Optimization Help Lease Revenue Purchase Transactional Coaching		Verizon Wireless AT&T T-Mobile - Sprint DISH Wireless US Cellular SiriusXM Crown Castle American Tower Atlas Tower Phoenix Tower PTI Vertical Bridge SBA Communications Tillman Infrastructure Lyle Company, Black Dot, Md7 Everest Infrastructure

Share this page:

What’s this?

Facebook Twitter Pinterest Tumblr Reddit WhatsApp

Like this page? Show us some Social Love. Here's how.

Would you prefer to share this page with others by linking to it?

Click on the HTML link code below.
Copy and paste it, adding a note of your own, into your blog, a Web page, forums, a blog comment, your Facebook account, or anywhere that someone would find this page valuable.