Our church was approached by AT&T about 1 year ago to lease our property for the purpose of building a cell tower onto existing electrical tower sitting on our property. They've been paying for about 10 months and they've just recently completed the building next to the electrical tower. Yesterday we received a registered letter inform us that they'll no longer be paying the lease. We didn't have anyone look over the lease agreement so I'm not sure what it says. Is this a tactic by AT&T to re-negotiate? What rights do we have as the property owners where their building now sits?
Like this page? Show us some Social Love. Here's how.
Would you prefer to share this page with others by linking to it?
Click on the HTML link code below.
Copy and paste it, adding a note of your own, into your blog, a Web page, forums, a blog comment, your Facebook account, or anywhere that someone would find this page valuable.
Our church has been approached by a company who wants to put a cell tower on our property. They first offered $1,000 per month with a 2% annual escalator
I own property that the cell tower company has to cross to access their proposed site. Are they entitled to legal use of the specific easement. Also our